“Shallow” private-sector engagement a major concern for integrated landscape initiatives

Heterogeneous humid tropical landscape of Sumatra, Indonesia. Photo By Degi Harja Asmara

Heterogeneous humid tropical landscape of Sumatra, Indonesia. Photo By Degi Harja Asmara

Integrated landscape initiatives in Latin America, the Caribbean and Africa are investing heavily in institutional planning and coordination, but they have had mixed results engaging different stakeholder groups, especially the private sector. This key stakeholder group was almost always missing from a selection of landscape initiatives surveyed recently.

“Incomplete” or “shallow” stakeholder engagement was the most frequently reported challenge by the nearly two hundred landscape initiatives from 54 countries (33 African and 21 from LAC region) that participated in the study. African initiatives were the most affected.

According the respondents, private-sector stakeholder groups representing agribusinesses and extractive industries (e.g. timber, oil and gas) rarely participated in their initiatives; they were involved in less than 10% of the initiatives in Africa and around 22% in the Latin America and Caribbean region.

Women and landless people

On the other hand, local farmer groups or producer associations were the most active stakeholder group in the landscape initiatives, participating in over 80% of the surveyed initiatives. Local government entities, extension agents, and local non-governmental organizations (NGOs) were equally active, and were involved in more than 70% of the initiatives.

Among the Latin America and Caribbean initiatives, women and landless people were another weakly engaged stakeholder group: “They were often involved in implementation but rarely in the design of initiatives.”

The chapter with these findings is part of a new World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) publication, Climate-Smart Landscapes: Multifunctionality in Practice. The volume brings together, for the first time, original research and syntheses on landscape approaches to climate change mitigation and adaptation.

Collaborators in the survey’s design were EcoAgriculture Partners, World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Rainforest Alliance, Bioversity International, Conservation International, Cornell University, and the Landscapes for People Food and Nature Initiative.

“Landscape initiatives have proliferated in recent years, as a result of converging demands for landscape multifunctionality, and climate change,” says Abigail Hart, the article’s lead author and project manager of research with Cornell University’s Ecoagriculture Working Group. “However, there has been no systematic, empirical characterization of landscape initiatives to learn about their objectives, activities and outcomes.”

The current paper presents an analysis from 191 initiatives; 104 in the Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) region and 87 in Africa.

Clarify benefits

Stakeholder consultation in Sierra Leone. Photo by Djalal Ademonla Arinloye/ICRAF-Sahel

Stakeholder consultation in Sierra Leone. Photo by Djalal Ademonla Arinloye/ICRAF-Sahel

Hart says multifunctional, climate-smart landscapes are able to produce many different and sustained benefits for people and the environment in the face of climate-change, but stakeholder participation is essential.

“Clarifying the benefits of integrated landscape management to different stakeholder groups would be one way to increase stakeholder participation,” she states.

“Policy frameworks with incentives for such stakeholders to participate” will also be critical for the success of landscape initiatives. For private-sector stakeholders, incentives may include reduced risks to business and benefits for business’ reputation.

Stakeholder engagement in integrated landscape approaches would also be boosted if researchers were able to demonstrate, with evidence, that the benefits of integrated approaches outweigh their transaction costs, and that the magnitude of benefits to diverse stakeholders is greater than single-sector strategies for development and conservation.

The authors say “although practitioners recognized landscape approaches as challenging long-term endeavours, they also perceived them as necessary to solve problems where traditional sector-based approaches and scales of intervention have proven inadequate.”

As such, despite the challenge inherent in the approach, landscape initiatives are set to grow in importance. The researchers hope that the findings of this study will help to inform and improve the environment in which landscapes initiatives, particularly those in the developing world, operate.

They will, no doubt, because besides stakeholder analysis, the article is rich in data and insights gained from a systematic characterization of the context, motivations, investments, outcomes and participants of the 191 initiatives using landscape approaches in Africa and Latin America.

Download the article: Integrated landscape initiatives in practice: assessing experiences from 191 landscapes in Africa and Latin America. By Abigail K. Hart, Jeffrey C. Milder, Natalia Estrada-Carmona, Fabrice A. J. DeClerck, Celia A. Harvey and Philip Dobie. Chapter 7 of the publication: Climate-Smart Landscapes: Multifunctionality in Practice

See a selection of photos from the book: Climate Smart Landscapes: Multifunctionality in Practice

Related stories:

New book arms people with knowledge on landscapes in a changing climate

How to build a business case for climate smart landscape approach to the private sector

Climate-smart agriculture needs knowledge, cooperation and a healthy dose of trust

The landscape approach for meeting the climate challenge: Examples from Africa

Why climate change researchers are so excited about landscapes

Landscape approach: bridging the climate agenda with the Sustainable Development Goals

 

Share
Daisy Ouya

Daisy Ouya

Daisy Ouya is a science writer and communications specialist with the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF). Over the past 15 years she has been packaging and disseminating scientific knowledge in the fields of entomology, agriculture, health, HIV/AIDS research, and marine science. Daisy is a Board-certified Editor in the Life Sciences (bels.org) and has a Masters’ degree in chemistry from the University of Connecticut, USA. Her BSc is from the University of Nairobi in her native Kenya. She has worked as a journal editor, science writer, publisher, and communications strategist with various organizations. She joined ICRAF in July 2012. Twitter: @daisyouya

You may also like...